Highlights:
This study examines the impact of farm input subsidies, food and cash transfers, and irrigation investments on the dietary diversity, food consumption scores, and coping strategy index in Malawi. Despite the potential for synergies to address a range of vulnerabilities affecting food consumption, very few studies focus on combined program effects.

The study shows that households that receive food and cash transfers showed improvements in diet diversity and the food consumption score. Input subsidies were less effective in helping households cope with food insecurity and reduced diet diversity and the food consumption score.
This suggests that overreliance on agricultural input subsidies may lead to reduced variety in food consumption. Policies that are aimed at more linkages between programs should also diversity and rebalance public spending to reduce food and nutrition insecurity.
Year of publication | |
Authors | |
Geographic coverage | Malawi |
Originally published | 05 Jun 2024 |
Related organisation(s) | World Bank |
Knowledge service | Metadata | Global Food and Nutrition Security | Food security and food crises | IrrigationDietary diversityFood availabilityFood and nutrition securityFood consumptionAccess to foodSafety net |
Digital Europa Thesaurus (DET) | Impact Assessmentagricultural policyfood aidcash and voucher assistanceModellinginvestmentFarmhouseholdsample survey |