The report on the economic benefits of agroecology, primarily based on the ProSoil program, emphasizes several key messages regarding the economic viability and broader impacts of agroecological practices:
1. Economic Viability for Smallholder Farmers: Agroecological practices, such as soil and water conservation, integrated soil fertility management, and sustainable land management, have proven to be economically beneficial for smallholder farmers across various regions. These practices often lead to significant yield increases and improved financial returns. For instance, in Ethiopia and Tunisia, soil and water conservation efforts led to increased crop production and substantial returns on investment, sometimes as high as 700%.
2. Broader Economic and Social Benefits: Beyond direct economic benefits, agroecological practices contribute to broader societal gains, including improved food security, climate resilience, and better societal health. These practices not only enhance agricultural productivity but also support sustainable development by improving ecosystem services and reducing the environmental impact of farming.
3. Sustainable and Context-Specific Solutions: The report highlights the importance of context-specific solutions in implementing agroecological practices. Different regions benefit from tailored approaches, such as watershed development in India or the use of biochar in Kenya, which offer high profitability and sustainability in line with local conditions.
4. Challenges and Trade-offs: While these practices are generally profitable, they often require higher labor input, which may limit their adoption in areas with alternative employment opportunities. However, the long-term benefits typically outweigh these challenges, making agroecology a viable path for sustainable development.
Overall, the report strongly advocates for the adoption of agroecology, supported by substantial evidence of its economic and societal benefits, especially in the context of sustainable land management and food security.
Disclaimer: This summary has been generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) language model developed by OpenAI. For comprehensive information and context, please refer to the full document.
Year of publication | |
Publisher | Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) |
Geographic coverage | TunisiaBurkina FasoBeninMadagascarKenyaEthiopiaIndiaGlobal |
Originally published | 21 Aug 2024 |
Knowledge service | Metadata | Global Food and Nutrition Security | Agroecology | Smallholder agriculture |
Digital Europa Thesaurus (DET) | agricultural economicssustainable agriculturesoil protection |