In policy circles and public debates in Europe, especially since the recent crisis in the Mediterranean, it has frequently been suggested that people have been applying for asylum in or migrating irregularly to European Union Member States due to a lack of other pathways for migration. Conversely, it has also been claimed that opening up more legal channels for migration can reduce the number of people applying for asylum or attempting irregular journeys. However, to support these suggestions and claims, there is little empirical evidence of the extent to which people have actually attempted to access different legal statuses in response to changes in existing migration opportunities.
Resources
What relationship is there between irregular and regular migration? An exploratory study of EU residence permits, asylum applications, and orders to leave
More information and links
| Authors | SCIPIONI Marco BELMONTE Martina TINTORI Guido MCMAHON Simon |
| Geographic coverage | EuropeNorth AfricaAsia |
| Available from | 12 Dec 2019 |
| Knowledge service | Metadata | Migration and Demography | Attitudes and perceptions | Irregular migrationLegal pathways |
| Digital Europa Thesaurus (DET) | migration policy |
Related reading
The societal and political significance of migration has increased. Migration dynamics have become more complex in an interconnected world.
The root cause approach is a relevant and coherent framework for addressing development needs in migration and displacement contexts, and its effectiveness can be enhanced if clear and less...
Was this page useful?
Need help?
Consult our user manual or editorial guidance

The K4P User Manual tells you everything you need to know from a technical point of view, to create and publish content on K4P.

K4P Guidance gives you tips and advice on how to make your content effective from an editorial point of view, helping to make it clear and engaging.
