Skip to main content
Knowledge4Policy
Knowledge for policy
Supporting policy with scientific evidence

We mobilise people and resources to create, curate, make sense of and use knowledge to inform policymaking across Europe.

  • Publication | 2026
Scaling biofortified wheat production for agrifood and nutritional security in eastern India: Evidence from five years of multi-location field evaluations in Bihar

Highlights:

  • BHU-31 out yielded HD-2967 by ∼3.6 %, with yield 4.03 Mg ha⁻¹ .
  • Grain Zn > 38 mg kg⁻¹ in BHU-25 and BHU-31 across all districts.
  • Grain Fe ranged 33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹ , showing moderate environmental sensitivity.
  • Yield remained > 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ during stress seasons (2021–22).

Abstract:

Context

Micronutrient malnutrition (“hidden hunger”) remains a persistent agrifood and public health challenge in South Asia. Although cereal-based diets ensure calorie sufficiency, they frequently fail to meet essential micronutrient requirements, particularly zinc and iron. In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP) of India, Bihar exhibits a high prevalence of anemia, stunting, and underweight populations. Addressing these challenges requires scalable, food-based nutritional interventions that enhance dietary quality without compromising crop productivity, climatic resilience, or farmer incomes.

Objective

This study tested the hypothesis that zinc-biofortified wheat varieties can simultaneously deliver stable grain yield, enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations, and broad agro-ecological adaptability under farmer-managed conditions in Bihar.

Methods

Multi-location field evaluations were conducted over five consecutive wheat-growing seasons (2018–19–2022–23) across all 14 districts of Bihar, covering diverse agro-climatic sub-zones. Two zinc-biofortified wheat varieties (BHU-25 and BHU-31) were compared with a widely cultivated commercial variety (HD-2967). The dataset comprised more than 11,000 plot-level observations generated through HarvestPlus yield trials, strip trials, and farmer-led demonstrations conducted under real-world management practices.

Results

Across locations and seasons, both biofortified varieties produced grain yields comparable to, or numerically higher than, the commercial check (HD-2967), with mean yields ranging from 3.9 to 4.2 Mg ha⁻¹ . Although BHU-31 recorded a numerically higher mean yield (3.6 %) and BHU-25 a marginal advantage (0.5 %) over HD-2967, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), indicating the absence of a yield penalty associated with biofortification. Grain zinc concentrations consistently met or exceeded the biofortification target of 38 mg kg⁻¹ and remained stable across environments, with district means ranging from 26.4 to 40.1 mg kg⁻¹ . Grain iron concentrations showed moderate but significant spatial variation across environments (33.2–40.5 mg kg⁻¹). Importantly, during climatically adverse seasons characterized by excessive rainfall and heat stress, both biofortified varieties maintained yields above 3.0 Mg ha⁻¹ , comparable to the commercial check.

Conclusions

Zinc-biofortified wheat varieties demonstrated a rare combination of high yield potential, enhanced micronutrient density, and climatic resilience under farmer-managed conditions, with no evidence of a yield penalty.

Implications and limitations

The findings provide robust field-scale evidence that zinc-biofortified wheat is a cost-effective, climate-resilient, and nutrition-sensitive intervention for cereal-based food systems. Integration of these varieties into public procurement, school feeding programs, and decentralized seed systems offers a scalable pathway to improve dietary zinc intake while sustaining wheat productivity in Bihar and similar agro-ecosystems of South Asia. While the study captures extensive spatial and temporal variability, direct assessments of household consumption and nutritional outcomes were beyond its scope.