We mobilise people and resources to create, curate, make sense of and use knowledge to inform policymaking across Europe.
The Environmental Footprint is a methodology to assess the environmental performance of products and organisations. Here, you can explore the pivotal contribution of the Joint Research Centre to the methodology.
A company wishing to market its product as environmentally friendly in several Member State markets faces a confusing range of choices of methods and initiatives. Sometimes, they have to use different ones for different markets. This results in costs for companies and confusion for consumers.
The European Commission proposed the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and Organisation Environmental Footprint (EF) methods as a common way of measuring environmental performance (EU Commission Recommendation 2021/2279). The PEF and OEF are the EU recommended Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based methods to quantify the environmental impacts of products (goods or services) and organisations.
The overarching purpose of PEF and OEF information is to enable to reduce the environmental impacts of goods, services and organisations taking into account supply chain activities (from extraction of raw materials, through production and use to final waste management). This purpose is achieved through the provision of detailed requirements for modelling the environmental impacts of the flows of material/energy and the emissions and waste streams associated with a product or an organisation throughout the life cycle.
You can find policy-related information on the Environmental Footprint methods page hosted by DG ENV, which contains the scheduled PEF/OEF trainings and the archive of past trainings including recordings and slides.
The JRC plays a key role in the context of the Environmental Footprint. The JRC has been leading the technical and scientific development of the EF methods, defining the methodological requirements to be followed to perform EF studies and being responsible for many activities related to data development and provision.
A non-exhaustive list of JRC activities in support to EF development is:
EF compliant datasets (processes) are available through the nodes of data providers, the list of nodes currently deployed is available in the contact list of the EF registry in the Life Cycle Data Network. The datasets of the Representative Products are available for free in the EF node of the European Commission.
[INSERT LINK TO /LCDN/contactlistEF.html]
The common methods to measure the life cycle environmental performances for PEF and OEF have been included in the Commission Recommendation 2021/2279 published in December 2021 .
The main aims of the Transition Phase were:
The JRC has developed two technical reports to revise and update the Product Environmental Footprint and the Organisation Environmental Footprint methods. These reports contain suggestions on how the PEF and OEF Guides should be amended in the future to reflect the developments and the practical experience gained during the Pilot Phase. The two technical reports are the reference documents to develop PEFCRs and OEFSRs in the EF transition phase.
Check the dedicated page by clicking the box below and access key related documents.
EF Transition Phase
From 2013 to 2018, the Environmental Footprint (EF) Pilot Phase has been carried out with three main objectives:
Methodological improvements were developed during the EF pilot phase and were implemented in the PEFCRs and OEFSRs. Such methodological updates are available in the PEFCR Guidance 6.3 and OEFSR Guidance 6.3.
The common methods to measure the life cycle environmental performances for PEF and OEF have been included for the first time in the EU Recommendation 2013/179/EU.
The "Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and Organizations" forms the starting point for the development of a harmonized European methodology for environmental footprint that can accommodate a broad suite of relevant environmental performance criteria, including greenhouse gas emissions. The results suggest that advancing European guidance documents that provide for a greater degree of methodological specificity than existing methods and standards is required to move towards more consistency and reproducibility of results. This will be much more challenging for the company side where, in contrast to product footprint, life cycle approaches have not previously played an important role.
04 Sep 2025 | 04 May 2026
Share this page