This study evaluates the costs and benefits on fisheries and aquaculture of three types of spatial protection measures: (i) Fish Stock Recovery Areas (FSRAs), (ii) Marine...
This study evaluates the costs and benefits on fisheries and aquaculture of three types of spatial protection measures: (i) Fish Stock Recovery Areas (FSRAs), (ii) Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), and areas designated as (iii) Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs). The research assesses how far fisheries co-management approaches can potentially help to achieve the European Union targets. The study uses three case studies from France, Spain and Greece to collect data on the different types of spatial protection measures and assesses how the cost-benefit analysis framework can be applied for their evaluation.
Find out more here.
Originally Published | 24 Oct 2022 |
Related organisation(s) | EP - European Parliament |
Knowledge service | Metadata | Biodiversity |Biodiversity and health |
Digital Europa Thesaurus (DET) | biodiversitycommon fisheries policyEU policymarine and aquatic researchMarineecosystemaquatic ecosystemprotected areafishery managementenvironmental protectionnatural resourcesfishery resourcescost analysisImpact Assessmentresearch |
Geographic coverage | EUGreeceSpainFranceEuropean Union |
This study argues for a globally coordinated approach to marine conservation and food security, as regional scale strategies are shown to be less efficient and may result...
This Impact assessment (IA) examines the problem's nature and scale comprehensively. It offers a broad and realistic range of policy options and presents the stakeholders' views on...